Abstract
Abstract
The 2020 presidential election brought expanded vote-by-mail opportunities, a rise in attacks on this process’s integrity, and the implementation of novel programs such as California’s Where’s My Ballot? system to ensure confidence in mail balloting. Can heightening awareness of this ballot-tracking system and other election protections alleviate fraud concerns and raise turnout? We assess whether messages reinforcing election integrity increased participation in the 2020 election through a large-scale voter mobilization field experiment. California registrants were mailed a letter that described either existing safeguards to prevent vote-by-mail fraud or the ability to track one’s ballot and ensure that it was counted. Analysis of state voter records reveals that neither message increased turnout over a simple election reminder or even no contact, even among subgroups where larger effects might be expected. In the context of a high-profile, high-turnout presidential election, assurances about ballot and electoral integrity did not increase turnout.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference24 articles.
1. Voting Experiences, Perceptions of Fraud, and Voter Confidence;Alvarez;Social Science Quarterly,2021
2. Replication Data for: Can Addressing Integrity Concerns about Mail Balloting Increase Turnout? Results from a Large-Scale Field Experiment in the 2020 Presidential Election;Biggers;Harvard Dataverse, V1.,2022
3. Increasing Inequality: The Effect of GOTV Mobilization on the Composition of the Electorate;Enos;Journal of Politics,2014
4. Ballot Secrecy Concerns and Voter Mobilization: New Experimental Evidence about Message Source, Context, and the Duration of Mobilization Effects;Gerber;American Politics Research,2014
5. Are Americans Confident their Ballots are Counted?;Alvarez;Journal of Politics,2008
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献