Author:
CLAHSEN HARALD,FELSER CLAUDIA
Abstract
The ability to process the linguistic input in real time is crucial for successfully acquiring a language, and yet little is known about how language learners comprehend or produce language in real time. Against this background, we have conducted a detailed study of grammatical processing in language learners using experimental psycholinguistic techniques and comparing different populations (mature native speakers, child first language [L1] and adult second language [L2] learners) as well as different domains of language (morphology and syntax). This article presents an overview of the results from this project and of other previous studies, with the aim of explaining how grammatical processing in language learners differs from that of mature native speakers. For child L1 processing, we will argue for a continuity hypothesis claiming that the child's parsing mechanism is basically the same as that of mature speakers and does not change over time. Instead, empirical differences between child and mature speaker's processing can be explained by other factors such as the child's limited working memory capacity and by less efficient lexical retrieval. In nonnative (adult L2) language processing, some striking differences to native speakers were observed in the domain of sentence processing. Adult learners are guided by lexical–semantic cues during parsing in the same way as native speakers, but less so by syntactic information. We suggest that the observed L1/L2 differences can be explained by assuming that the syntactic representations adult L2 learners compute during comprehension are shallower and less detailed than those of native speakers.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Psychology,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference141 articles.
1. Frazier L. , & Clifton C. 1996.Construal.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
2. Gaulin C. , & Campbell T. 1994.Procedure for assessing verbal working memory in normal school-age children: Some preliminary data.Perceptual and Motor Skills,79,55–64.
3. Pickering M. 1999.Sentence comprehension.In S. Garrod & M. Pickering (Eds.),Language processing(pp. 123–153).Hove, East Sussex:Psychology Press.
4. White L. , & Juffs A. 1998.Constraints on wh-movement in two different contexts of non-native language acquisition: Competence and processing.In S. Flynn , G. Martohardjono , & W. O'Neill (Eds.),The generative study of second language acquisition.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
5. Fodor J. D. 1989.Empty categories in sentence processing.Language and Cognitive Processes,4,155–209.
Cited by
720 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献