Grammatical processing in language learners

Author:

CLAHSEN HARALD,FELSER CLAUDIA

Abstract

The ability to process the linguistic input in real time is crucial for successfully acquiring a language, and yet little is known about how language learners comprehend or produce language in real time. Against this background, we have conducted a detailed study of grammatical processing in language learners using experimental psycholinguistic techniques and comparing different populations (mature native speakers, child first language [L1] and adult second language [L2] learners) as well as different domains of language (morphology and syntax). This article presents an overview of the results from this project and of other previous studies, with the aim of explaining how grammatical processing in language learners differs from that of mature native speakers. For child L1 processing, we will argue for a continuity hypothesis claiming that the child's parsing mechanism is basically the same as that of mature speakers and does not change over time. Instead, empirical differences between child and mature speaker's processing can be explained by other factors such as the child's limited working memory capacity and by less efficient lexical retrieval. In nonnative (adult L2) language processing, some striking differences to native speakers were observed in the domain of sentence processing. Adult learners are guided by lexical–semantic cues during parsing in the same way as native speakers, but less so by syntactic information. We suggest that the observed L1/L2 differences can be explained by assuming that the syntactic representations adult L2 learners compute during comprehension are shallower and less detailed than those of native speakers.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

General Psychology,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference141 articles.

1. Frazier L. , & Clifton C. 1996.Construal.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.

2. Gaulin C. , & Campbell T. 1994.Procedure for assessing verbal working memory in normal school-age children: Some preliminary data.Perceptual and Motor Skills,79,55–64.

3. Pickering M. 1999.Sentence comprehension.In S. Garrod & M. Pickering (Eds.),Language processing(pp. 123–153).Hove, East Sussex:Psychology Press.

4. White L. , & Juffs A. 1998.Constraints on wh-movement in two different contexts of non-native language acquisition: Competence and processing.In S. Flynn , G. Martohardjono , & W. O'Neill (Eds.),The generative study of second language acquisition.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

5. Fodor J. D. 1989.Empty categories in sentence processing.Language and Cognitive Processes,4,155–209.

Cited by 720 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3