Abstract
Abstract
Silent pauses are a natural part of speech production and have consequences for speech perception. However, studies have shown mixed results regarding whether listeners process pauses in native and non-native speech similarly or differently. A possible explanation for these mixed results is that perceptual consequences of pauses differ depending on the type of processing that listeners engage in: a focus on the content/meaning of the speech versus style/form of the speech. Thus, the present study examines the effect of silent pauses of listeners’ perception of native and non-native speech in two different tasks: the perceived credibility and the perceived fluency of the speech. Specifically, we ask whether characteristics of silent pauses influence listeners’ perception differently for native versus non-native speech, and whether this pattern differs when listeners are rating the credibility versus the fluency of the speech. We find that while native speakers are rated as more fluent than non-native speakers, there is no evidence that native speakers are rated as more credible. Our findings suggest that the way a non-native accent and disfluency together impact speech perception differs depending on the type of processing that listeners are engaged in when listening to the speech.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Psychology,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference50 articles.
1. Can Likert scales be treated as interval scales?—A Simulation study;Wu;Journal of Social Service Research,2017
2. Not what you expected to hear: Accented messages and their effect on choice;Livingston;Journal of Management,2017
3. The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study;Munro;System,2006
4. Regional and foreign accent processing in English: Can listeners adapt?;Floccia;Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,2009
5. Souza, A. L. , & Markman, A. B. (2013). Foreign accent does not influence cognitive judgments. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society (Vol. 35, No. 35).