Abstract
Legally, it is possible to say of a particular company that it is a party to a criminal conspiracy, that it has acted dishonestly or that its conduct in matters of safety is so deficient as to amount to manslaughter. The mechanism which has brought most serious crimes within the competence of companies to commit is, of course, the concept of corporate alter ego or, more precisely, the doctrine of identification. This concept takes the conduct and state of mind of certain high-ranking officials to be the conduct and state of mind of the company itself, so that it may commit directly crimes which are not attributable to a company merely on a basis of vicarious liability.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Property/Personhood and AI;The Cambridge Handbook of Private Law and Artificial Intelligence;2024-03-28
2. Property;The Cambridge Handbook of Private Law and Artificial Intelligence;2024-03-28
3. Reforming Corporate Criminal Liability: Is the 2023 Act Too Much, or Not Enough?;SSRN Electronic Journal;2024
4. Moral Entanglement in Group Decision-Making: Explaining an Odd Rule in Corporate Criminal Liability;Criminal Law and Philosophy;2023-02-15
5. Corporate Manslaughter;Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management;2023