Author:
Brown K.N.,Williams J.H. Sims,McMahon C.A.
Abstract
AbstractThe ability to understand the implications of the geometry of solid objects is an important aspect of intelligent behavior. This paper presents work designed to enable reasoning with relatively loose conceptualizations of geometry. The method operates by comparing target geometry to known geometry, and involves the manipulation of models based upon prototypes. In particular, three techniques of simplification, approximation, and transformation are discussed. Finally, an application of the method to the domain of stress concentration prediction is presented.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Reference41 articles.
1. Joscowicz L. (1987). Shapes and function in mechanical devices. Proc. Am. Assoc. for AI Conf., pp. 611–615.
2. Reasoning with geometry: Predicting stress concentration factors
3. Waltz D.L. & Boggess L. (1979). Visual analog representations for natural language understanding. Proc. 6th Int. Joint Conf. on AI, 926–934.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Let’s Look at Style: Visual and Spatial Representation and Reasoning in Design;The Structure of Style;2010
2. Visual style: Qualitative and context-dependent categorization;Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing;2006-06-27
3. A qualitative feature-based characterization of 2D architectural style;Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology;2006
4. Categorisation of Shapes Using Shape Features;Artificial Intelligence in Design ’00;2000
5. El diseño de ingeniería y la inteligencia artificial;Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia;1997-10-20