Managing urgent surgery as a process: Case study of a trauma center

Author:

Torkki Paulus Mikael,Alho Antti Ilmari,Peltokorpi Antti Veikko,Torkki Markus Ilmari,Kallio Pentti Ensio

Abstract

Objectives:Industrial management principles could be used to improve the quality and efficiency of health care. In this study, we have evaluated the effects of a process management approach to trauma patient care. The major objective was to reduce the waiting times and increase the efficiency of the hospital.Methods:Urgent surgery care was analyzed as an overall process. The process development followed the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle and was based on statistical analysis of certain performance metrics. Data were collected from hospital databases and by personnel interviews. To develop the process, the anesthesia induction was performed outside the operating room, better process guidance was developed, and patient flow was reorganized. The transition time for these changes was 1 year (2002 to 2003).Results:Waiting times decreased by 20.5 percent (p<.05), nonoperative times in the operating room were reduced by 23.1 percent (p<.001), and efficiency was increased by 9.7 percent (p<.001) after reengineering of the care process. Overtime hours decreased by 30.9 percent.Conclusions:Managing urgent surgical care as a process can improve the productivity and quality of care without a need to increase personnel resources. The focus should be on reducing waiting times and waste times.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference13 articles.

1. Deming WE .1986.Out of the crisis.Cambridge, MA:Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Centre for Advanced Engineering Study;

2. Williams B , Kentor M , Williams J , et al.2000 Process analysis in outpatient knee surgery: Effects of regional and general anesthesia on anesthesia-controlled time.Anesthesiology.93:529–538.

3. Rotondi AJ , Brindis C , Cantees KK , et al.1997 Benchmarking the perioperative process. I. Patient routing systems: A method for continual improvement of patient flow and resource utilization.J Clin Anesth.9:159–169.

4. Karvonen S , Rämö J , Leijala M , Holmström J .2004 Productivity improvement in heart surgery—a case study on care process development.Prod Plan Control.15:238–246.

5. Laursen M , Gertsen F , Johansen J .2003 Applying lean thinking in hospitals—exploring implementation difficulties. The hospital of the future.Third international conference on the management of healthcare & medical technology.Warwick, UK:7–9th September.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3