Is the assumption of waning of treatment effect applied consistently across NICE technology appraisals? A case-study focusing on disease-modifying therapies for treatment of multiple sclerosis

Author:

Armoiry XavierORCID,Wang-Steverding Xia,Connock Martin,Grove Amy,Clarke Aileen,Arun Tarunya,Counsell Carl,Auguste Peter

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Whether the effects of therapies may wane over time is a matter of debate, especially when considering their long-term cost-effectiveness. Here, we examined how the assumption of the waning of treatment effect was applied across the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) appraisals for disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) used in multiple sclerosis. Methods We undertook a document analysis following a search of the NICE website. The inclusion criteria of the study were as follows: all publicly available documents related to completed appraisals for DMTs (period: January 2000 to July 2021). The exclusion criteria of the study were as follows: all documents that did not meet the inclusion criteria, especially pertaining to drugs used in other disease areas. We extracted information about the waning of treatment effect assumption as considered by companies, assessment groups, and appraisal committees, and we analyzed trends over time. Results We reviewed fifteen appraisals that reported guidance on sixteen DMTs. Irrespective of the drugs’ mechanism of action or their pharmaceutical nature, there was substantial variation in the modalities when the assumption of waning was implemented. We noted the recent preference to use all-cause discontinuation as a proxy. This heterogeneity did not appear to affect acceptance of the DMTs (all but one were recommended for use across the National Health System (NHS)). Conclusions Modeling the long-term effect of therapies is challenging, especially given the limited follow-up duration of related trials. This generates recurrent debates on the presence of waning of treatment efficacy and heterogeneity across appraisals. More refined recommendations obtained by consensus among stakeholders could help to achieve greater consistency in decision making.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference23 articles.

1. 10. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Single Technology Appraisal Ocrelizumab for treating primary progressive multiple sclerosis [ID938] Committee Papers Single Technology Appraisal Ocrelizumab for treating primary progressive multiple sclerosis [ID938] Contents. NICE; 2018.

2. 7. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Single technology appraisal (STA) Alemtuzumab for the treatment of relapsing- remitting multiple sclerosis in adults Specification for manufacturer / sponsor submission of evidence. NICE; 2013.

3. 1. MSsociety . MS Prevalence Report January 2020; 2020.

4. 5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Single Technology Appraisal Peginterferon beta-1a for treating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis [ID1521] Committee Papers. NICE; 2020.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3