Author:
Lehoux Pascale,Williams-Jones Bryn
Abstract
Background:Since its inception, the field of health technology assessment (HTA) has stressed the need for consideration of ethical and social issues. However, few concepts or analytic tools have been developed, and because of the complexity of the endeavor and a lack of integration of work already produced, such concepts remain difficult to apply in HTA.Objectives:Through a descriptive “map” of concepts, tools, and processes, we summarize the most tangible efforts on the part of HTA producers to address social and ethical issues.Methods:A literature review and content analysis of HTA reports in the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination database enables a synthesis of the reflections on, initiatives around, and gaps in knowledge related to the integration of social and ethical issues in HTA.Results:We examine: (i) the aim of integrating ethical and social issues in HTA, (ii) the theoretical approaches used, (iii) the methods and processes applied, and (iv) the implications for HTA producers. We highlight two levels at which social and ethical issues can be considered: throughout the production process of HTA reports and as part of the organizational structure of HTA agencies.Conclusions:Given the profound societal changes that occur in relation to healthcare technology development, HTA producers have a responsibility to inform and enlighten technology-related public and policy debates. Fulfilling this role, though, requires that socioethical dimensions of technologyandHTA are made explicit.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference42 articles.
1. Webster A .2004 Health technology assessment: A sociological commentary on reflexive innovation.Int J Technol Assess Health Care.20:61–66.
2. Lehoux P , Tailliez S , Denis J-L , Hivon M .2004 Redefining HTA in Canada: Diversification of products and contextualization of findings.Int J Technol Assess Health Care.20:325–336.
3. Lavis JN , Ross SE , Hurley JE , et al.2002 Examining the role of health services research in public policy-making.Milbank Q.80:125–154.
4. Hofmann B .2005 Toward a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment.Int J Technol Assess Health Care.21:312–318.
5. Dixon-Woods M , Agarwal S , Young B , Jones D , Sutton A .2004.Integrative approaches to qualitative and quantitative evidence.London:National Health Service (NHS), Health Development Agency;
Cited by
86 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献