Abstract
Objectives:The complexity of health technology assessment (HTA) has increased, in part because of its evolution through three distinct phases: the machine, the clinical outcomes, and the delivery models. However, the theoretical foundation for the field remains underdeveloped.Methods:It is high time for HTA to bring together aspects of conceptual and theoretical works from other fields to strengthen the foundation of HTA.Results:Many challenges await the further development of HTA. They can be captured around three research themes: adapting HTA to an evolving analysis object; translating HTA results into policy, management, and practice decisions; and evaluating organizational models of HTA.Conclusions:Consolidating the scientific basis of HTA is essential if we are to succeed in increasing the relevance of HTA in some of the most challenging health-related decisions that we will make as individuals and societies.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference25 articles.
1. Montague T. 2004.Patients first-closing the health care gap in Canada.Canada:John Wiley & Sons Canada Ltd;
2. 2003:Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.A study of the impact of 2001-2002 health technology assessment products–final report.IP-15 Information Paper,34.
3. Battista RN , Hodge MJ .1997:Putting the genome to work: Testing for genetic disease and implications for health services.In: The economic aspects of biotechnologies related to human health. Biotechnology and medical innovation: Socio-economic assessment of the technology, the potential and the products.Paris:OECD;149–231.
4. Battista RN , Vineis P , Hodge MJ .1995;Medicine, practice and guidelines: The uneasy juncture of science and art.J Clin Epidemiol.48:875–880.
5. Coons SJ .1996;Disease management: Definitions and exploration of ssues.Clin Ther.18:1321–1326.
Cited by
47 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献