Real-world evidence: perspectives on challenges, value, and alignment of regulatory and national health technology assessment data collection requirements

Author:

Sievers HannahORCID,Joos Angelika,Hiligsmann Mickaël

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study aims to assess stakeholder perceptions on the challenges and value of real-world evidence (RWE) post approval, the differences in regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) real-world data (RWD) collection requirements under the German regulation for more safety in drug supply (GSAV), and future alignment opportunities to create a complementary framework for postapproval RWE requirements. Methods Eleven semistructured interviews were conducted purposively with pharmaceutical industry experts, regulatory authorities, health technology assessment bodies (HTAbs), and academia. The interview questions focused on the role of RWE post approval, the added value and challenges of RWE, the most important requirements for RWD collection, experience with registries as a source of RWD, perceptions on the GSAV law, RWE requirements in other countries, and the differences between regulatory and HTA requirements and alignment opportunities. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and translated for coding in Nvivo to summarize the findings. Results All experts agree that RWE could close evidence gaps by showing the actual value of medicines in patients under real-world conditions. However, experts acknowledged certain challenges such as: (i) heterogeneous perspectives and differences in outcome measures for RWE generation and (ii) missing practical experience with RWD collected through mandatory registries within the German benefit assessment due to an unclear implementation of the GSAV. Conclusions This study revealed that all stakeholder groups recognize the added value of RWE but experience conflicting demands for RWD collection. Harmonizing requirements can be achieved through common postlicensing evidence generation (PLEG) plans and joint scientific advice to address uncertainties regarding evidence needs and to optimize drug development.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference24 articles.

1. EU-funded initiatives for real world evidence: descriptive analysis of their characteristics and relevance for regulatory decision-making

2. 9. Deutsche Krankenhausgesellschaft. Stellungsnahme der Deutschen Krankenhausgesellschaft zum Gesetzentwurf der Bundesregierung für ein Gesetz für mehr Sicherheit in der Arzneimittelversorgung (GSAV). 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 6]. Available from: https://www.dkgev.de/fileadmin/default/Mediapool/1_DKG/1.3_Politik/Stellungnahmen/2019-02-20_DKG-Stellungnahme_Gesetzentwurf_GSAV.pdf

3. 10. APM Health Europe. Germany's G-BA ready for early discussions on post-launch data collection - Conference. APM News; 2020.

4. 15. Bundesverband der Pharmazeutischen Industrie e.V. (BPI). Stellungnahme zum Referentenentwurf des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit Entwurf eines Gesetzes für mehr Sicherheit in der Arzneimittelversorgung (GSAV). 2018 [cited 2020 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/fileadmin/Dateien/3_Downloads/Gesetze_und_Verordnungen/Stellungnahmen_WP19/GSAV/BPI.pdf

5. 14. International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. ISPOR 2020 Top 10 HEOR Trends. ISPOR

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3