Abstract
Abstract
Objective
This study aims to assess stakeholder perceptions on the challenges and value of real-world evidence (RWE) post approval, the differences in regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) real-world data (RWD) collection requirements under the German regulation for more safety in drug supply (GSAV), and future alignment opportunities to create a complementary framework for postapproval RWE requirements.
Methods
Eleven semistructured interviews were conducted purposively with pharmaceutical industry experts, regulatory authorities, health technology assessment bodies (HTAbs), and academia. The interview questions focused on the role of RWE post approval, the added value and challenges of RWE, the most important requirements for RWD collection, experience with registries as a source of RWD, perceptions on the GSAV law, RWE requirements in other countries, and the differences between regulatory and HTA requirements and alignment opportunities. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and translated for coding in Nvivo to summarize the findings.
Results
All experts agree that RWE could close evidence gaps by showing the actual value of medicines in patients under real-world conditions. However, experts acknowledged certain challenges such as: (i) heterogeneous perspectives and differences in outcome measures for RWE generation and (ii) missing practical experience with RWD collected through mandatory registries within the German benefit assessment due to an unclear implementation of the GSAV.
Conclusions
This study revealed that all stakeholder groups recognize the added value of RWE but experience conflicting demands for RWD collection. Harmonizing requirements can be achieved through common postlicensing evidence generation (PLEG) plans and joint scientific advice to address uncertainties regarding evidence needs and to optimize drug development.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference24 articles.
1. EU-funded initiatives for real world evidence: descriptive analysis of their characteristics and relevance for regulatory decision-making
2. 9. Deutsche Krankenhausgesellschaft. Stellungsnahme der Deutschen Krankenhausgesellschaft zum Gesetzentwurf der Bundesregierung für ein Gesetz für mehr Sicherheit in der Arzneimittelversorgung (GSAV). 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 6]. Available from: https://www.dkgev.de/fileadmin/default/Mediapool/1_DKG/1.3_Politik/Stellungnahmen/2019-02-20_DKG-Stellungnahme_Gesetzentwurf_GSAV.pdf
3. 10. APM Health Europe. Germany's G-BA ready for early discussions on post-launch data collection - Conference. APM News; 2020.
4. 15. Bundesverband der Pharmazeutischen Industrie e.V. (BPI). Stellungnahme zum Referentenentwurf des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit Entwurf eines Gesetzes für mehr Sicherheit in der Arzneimittelversorgung (GSAV). 2018 [cited 2020 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/fileadmin/Dateien/3_Downloads/Gesetze_und_Verordnungen/Stellungnahmen_WP19/GSAV/BPI.pdf
5. 14. International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. ISPOR 2020 Top 10 HEOR Trends. ISPOR
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献