Author:
Dintsios Charalabos-Markos,Schlenkrich Sara
Abstract
Objectives: Optional scientific advice (SA) for the early benefit assessment of pharmaceuticals is offered by the German decision maker, the Federal Joint Committee (FJC). The aim of this study was to elicit manufacturers’ experiences with the SA procedures offered by the FJC to date.Methods: A preliminary survey on a small sample size was conducted. Subsequently, a questionnaire comprising eight items, which was developed on the basis of that survey, was used. Data were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative approaches.Results: The elicitation, including a sample of 25 percent of the completed advice, highlighted the following, regarding the process as well as to the content shortcomings of the SA procedures from an industrial perspective: inconsistencies, FJC's lack of expertise in conducting clinical trials, partially incomplete answers. and a low willingness of the FJC to engage in dialogue with industry were criticized. On the other hand, the majority of respondents expressed a positive attitude concerning unambiguousness, completeness, traceability, discussion atmosphere, and the protocol of the advice. Early SA, before pivotal trials start, showed a significantly higher completeness compared with late SA with respect to endpoints and study duration. Within 4 years the quality of FJC's propositions on some topics improved significantly.Conclusions: Only a few statistically significant differences were detectable between early versus late SA. A positive trend in industry's perception of the SA can be observed over time. A more active involvement of additional stakeholders and the incorporation of procedural elements from other healthcare systems could improve the quality of the SA offered by the FJC.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference31 articles.
1. AMNOG in der Umsetzung: Preisregulierung als Innovationsbremse;Cassel;RPG,2013
2. Integrating health technology assessment requirements in the clinical development of medicines: the experience from NICE scientific advice;Maignen;Eur J Clin Pharmacol,2017
3. INTERACTION INITIATIVES BETWEEN REGULATORY, HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AND COVERAGE BODIES, AND INDUSTRY
4. New trends and challenges in the European regulation of innovative medicines;Enzmann;Regul Toxicol Pharmacol,2016
5. Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut. Strukturierte Zusammenarbeit zwischen dem Gemeinsamen Bundesausschuss, dem Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte und dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut. 2016. http://www.bmg.bund.de/fileadmin/dateien/Downloads/P/Pharmadialog/Vereinbarung_G-BA-BOB_2016-04-12.pdf (accessed August 16, 2016).
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献