Author:
Neyt Mattias J.,Albrecht Johan A.,Clarysse Bart,Cocquyt Véronique F.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of Herceptin® from the hospital's point of view. This new biotechnological pharmaceutical is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the HER2 receptor, an important anti-cancer target.Methods: A cost model with standard diagnostic and treatment options for breast cancer was set up for a Belgian university hospital in close collaboration with its specialists. Direct and indirect costs were calculated for each diagnostic and treatment option using the micro-costing method. Effectiveness was estimated through a literature study. The model allowed us to take cost consequences in other stages of the model into account and to calculate changes in monthly treatment costs from different “starting points.” With an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis, differences in costs and effectiveness with and without Herceptin® were compared.Results: Over the complete treatment period from diagnosis until the metastatic phase, monthly costs for the hospital rose from €85.07 to €90.35 for stage I diagnosed breast cancer when adding Herceptin® to the model. In the metastatic phase alone, these costs rose from €1,132.33 to €1,256.23. With Herceptin®, we found an extra cost of €3,981.44 per extra life-month.Conclusions: This cost-effectiveness ratio was rather high, because Herceptin® was quite expensive and the product was additive in its current use and did not replace existing treatments. Future research will concentrate on alternative applications of Herceptin® based on ongoing Herceptin® trials and expert opinions.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference11 articles.
1. Honig S .1996 Treatment of metastatic disease: Hormonal therapy and chemotherapy.In: Harris J , Lippman M , Morrow M , Hellman S , eds.Diseases of the breast.Philadelphia:Lippincott Raven Publishers;669–734.
2. Berkowitz N , Gupta S , Silberman G .2000 Estimates of the lifetime direct costs of treatment for metastatic breast cancer.Value Health.3:23–30.
3. Nuijten M .1999 Pharmacoeconomics in European decision-making.Value Health.2:319–322.
4. Hess G , Watrous M , Strutton D , Bower A .1999:The role of pharmacoeconomics in response to globalization and increased competition in the pharmaceutical industry.In: Salek S , ed.Pharmacoeconomics and outcome assessment, a global issue.Haslemere, UK:Euromed Communications Ltd;119–142.
5. Hummel M , Rossum W , Verkerke G , Rakhorst G .2000 Assessing medical technologies in development: A new paradigm of medical technology assessment.Int J Technol Assess Health Care.16:1214–1219.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献