The Use of Societal Criteria in Priority Setting for Health Technology Assessment in the Netherlands: Initial Experiences and Future Challenges

Author:

Oortwijn Wija J.,Vondeling Hindrik,Bouter Lex

Abstract

AbstractPriority setting for the evaluation of health technologies in the Netherlands is exclusively based on the scientific merits of individual research proposals. This process has not resulted in satisfactory allocation of resources. Therefore, societal criteria for setting priorities for health technology assessment have been proposed as an adjunct to scientific criteria. These societal criteria include the burden of disease, uncertainty about the (cost-)effectiveness of the intervention at issue, the potential benefits of the research project, and its potential impact on health care. To realize the full potential of this model for priority setting, a number of methodological issues need to be addressed. Joint efforts of researchers and policy makers in this field are necessary for future progress.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference45 articles.

1. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature

2. Prioriteiten voor Technology Assessment: Is er een gouden standaard? [Priorities for technology assessment: Is there a gold standard?];Boer;Tijdschrift voor Sociale Gezond-heidszorg,1995

3. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature

4. Onderzoeksfinanciering: Aanbesteding of open inschrijving? [redactioneel]. [Funding for research: top-down or bottom-up? (editorial)];Bouter;Tijdschrift voor Sociale Gezondheidszorg,1994

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Topic selection process in health technology assessment agencies around the world: a systematic review;International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care;2022

2. Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy;International Journal of Health Policy and Management;2020-08-11

3. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY DISINVESTMENT WORLDWIDE: OVERVIEW OF PROGRAMS AND POSSIBLE DETERMINANTS;International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care;2017

4. A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice;Health Research Policy and Systems;2010-12

5. Supporting tough decisions in Norway: A healthcare system approach;International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care;2010-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3