Slippery platform: The role of automatic and intentional processes in testing the effect of notation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Slippery platform: The role of automatic and intentional processes in testing the effect of notation

Published:2009-08 Issue:3-4 Volume:32 Page:328-329
ISSN:0140-525X
Container-title:Behavioral and Brain Sciences
language:en
Short-container-title:Behav Brain Sci

Author:

Algom Daniel

Abstract

AbstractThe type of processing of numerical dimensions varies greatly and is governed by context. Considering this flexibility in tandem with a fuzzy demarcation line between automatic and intentional processes, it is suggested that testing the effect of notation should not be confined to automatic processing, in particular to passive viewing. Recent behavioral data satisfying the authors' stipulations reveal a considerable, though perhaps not exclusive, core of common abstract processing.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Physiology,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Reference14 articles.

1. Integers do not automatically activate their quantity representation

2. Naming two-digit Arabic numerals: Evidence from masked priming studies;Ratinckx;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,2005

3. Comparative judgment of numerosity and numerical magnitude: Attention preempts automaticity;Pansky;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,2002

4. Ben-Nathan M. (2009) Multiple representations for numbers: How abstract they are? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tel-Aviv University.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Magnitude processing of written number words is influenced by task, rather than notation;Acta Psychologica;2018-11