Author:
Brandt Mark J.,Proulx Travis
Abstract
AbstractOne possible consequence of ideological homogeneity is the misinterpretation of data collected with otherwise solid methods. To help identify these issues outside of politically relevant research, we name and give broad descriptions to three questionable interpretive practices described by Duarte et al. and introduce three additional questionable theoretical practices that also reduce the theoretical power and paradigmatic scope of psychology.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Physiology,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference7 articles.
1. The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis
2. Jussim L. , Crawford J. T. , Stevens S. T. & Anglin S. M. (in press b) The politics of social psychological science, I: Distortions in the social psychology of intergroup relations. In: Bridging ideological divides: The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology, ed. P. Valdeso & J. Graham . Wiley-Blackwell.
3. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Cited by
52 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Simplification is Not Indoctrination;Psychology Learning & Teaching;2023-09-10
2. Do Data Show That Textbooks in Psychology Treat Critique in an Ideological Manner?;Psychology Learning & Teaching;2023-08-24
3. What Is Meant by ‘Politics of Psychology’?;Ideological and Political Bias in Psychology;2023
4. Index;The Handbook of Behavior Change;2020-07-31
5. The Science of Behavior Change: The Road Ahead;The Handbook of Behavior Change;2020-07-23