Finding the true place ofHomo habilisin language evolution

Abstract

AbstractDespite some sound basic assumptions, Wilkins & Wakefield portray aHomo habilistoo linguistically sophisticated to fit in with the subsequent fossil record and thereby lose a reasoned explanation for human innovativeness. They err, too, in accepting a single-level model of conceptual structure and in deriving initial linguistic units from calls, a process far more dubious than the derivation of home-sign from naive gesture.