Abstract
Stanovich & West (S&W) have two goals, one concerned with the evaluation of normative models, the other with development of prescriptive models. Individual differences have no bearing on normative models, which are justified by analysis, not consensus. Individual differences do, however, suggest where it is possible to try to improve human judgments and decisions through education rather than computers.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Physiology,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Funktion und Einsatz von menschlicher Intuition;Künstliche Intelligenz und Intuition;2023
2. Adaptive Rationality, Biases, and the Heterogeneity Hypothesis;Review of Philosophy and Psychology;2015-08-14
3. Stanovich's arguments against the “adaptive rationality” project: An assessment;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences;2015-02
4. Proportion dominance: The generality and variability of favoring relative savings over absolute savings;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes;2006-05