Abstract
Horace's Epodes are seldom considered as a whole. On the face of it, there would seem to be good reason for this fact. It is generally agreed that the poems were written over a period of ten years (from after Philippi to after Actium), during which time there was a great deal of change in the Roman world and in Horace's circumstances. Furthermore, the collection contains a considerable diversity of themes, genres and what, for lack of a better expression, one must call levels of reality. The Archilochean persona maintained in several of the poems is a unifying factor, of course, but it has not seemed pervasive enough to have allowed a systematic interpretation of the whole collection, and even within the Archilochean group scholars have tended to separate the political poems from the invective poems.3 Attempts to find some principle of arrangement for the collection have not been very enlightening, since they have rarely amounted to more than classifying each of the poems by type or theme (usually a completely unsystematic mixture of both), and then putting them into groups, which reveals structural patterns that have a no more than decorative function, or else simply displays Horace's penchant for variatio.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Classics
Reference10 articles.
1. Omne militabitur bellum. The Language of Commitment in Epode 1;Babcock;CJ,1974
2. The epodes of Horace
Cited by
95 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Conclusion and Epilogue;Ancient Roman Literary Gardens;2024-08-16
2. Columella and the Poetics of Horticulture;Ancient Roman Literary Gardens;2024-08-16
3. Trampling in the Garden;Ancient Roman Literary Gardens;2024-08-16
4. Women in the Garden;Ancient Roman Literary Gardens;2024-08-16
5. Vergil’s Garden (Georgics 4.116–48);Ancient Roman Literary Gardens;2024-08-16