Abstract
ABSTRACTIt will be fifty years in 2008 since Oliver MacDonagh suggested that the adoption of new responsibilities by the state in the early nineteenth century was an inevitable response to the social consequences of the industrial revolution, and impervious to ideological and philosophical influences. This article revisits MacDonagh's model by examining the emergence of occupational health reform in the British mining industry in the early twentieth century. Until the introduction of statutory measures in 1905 to protect miners against developing silicosis and basic sanitation provisions to prevent cross-contamination of disease, state regulation of working conditions prioritized the prevention of accidental injuries. It is argued that this decisive shift in the scope and nature of government intervention can be understood as part of a process of institutional expansion of mining regulations that broadly parallels MacDonagh's model. Yet the precise details of when, and how, health reform emerged and the nature of these specific regulatory controls were influenced by a variety of factors, including visibility of risk, human agency, economic performance of the industry, and contemporary thinking in political economy.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference22 articles.
1. The Kinnaird commission: siliceous dust, the pitfalls of cause and effect correlations and the case of the Cornish miners in the mid-nineteenth century;Mills;Scottish Labour History Review,2005
2. Laissez Faire and State Intervention in Nineteenth-Century Britain
3. The Coal Mines Act of 1842, Social Reform, and Social Control
4. Conservative and radical interpretations of early Victorian social legislation;Aydelotte;Victorian Studies,1967
5. The development of compensation for occupational diseases of the lungs in Great Britain;Meiklejohn;British Journal of Industrial Medicine,1954
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献