Abstract
Historians will give no thanks for being told that professionalization models are fraught with pitfalls as putative interpretations of scientific development. When deployedstricto sensu, essentially to trace the evolution of the remunerated career structure, the concept of professionalization invites blinkered antiquarian administrative history. Too easily, however, the jargon can serve as a blanket pseudo-explanation of the key phenomena of modern science, and thereby it loses all precision. Thus a recent author, having noted that professionalization is a Protean term, concludes ‘perhaps we can use it to mean the emergence of a scientific community’. But this runs the risk of collapsing quite distinct concepts into each other, and thereby of begging the very questions which must be faced.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference164 articles.
1. Porter , ‘The Natural Sciences Tripos’, p. 8
2. He maintained the honour of a gentleman;Hull's;Geological Magazine,1917
Cited by
111 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献