Abstract
ABSTRACTDespite differing historiographical traditions, the histories of Tudor England and Ireland often face similar problems, not least how best to narrate and analyse episodes of state and non-state violence in a satisfying way. Latterly, sophisticated models for dealing with this have emerged in treatments of English popular politics. These works succeed in eschewing both inherited ideas of English exceptionalism and the ‘enclosure’ of social history. They also offer a compelling and holistic view of social and political interactions in the past from a number of vantage points. Many recent treatments of sixteenth-century Irish history, by contrast, have centred on atrocity and even genocide. This narrower focus does not preclude important scholarship, but its thematic and methodological limitations hamper that scholarship's broader non-polemical value. The appreciation of Tudor Ireland's status as a political society and the close scrutiny of that political society and its actors is a necessity. It offers just as promising an embarkation point for sophisticated and interesting studies as the study of Tudor English popular politics.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Toward a New Moral Understanding of the Tudor Conquest of Ireland;Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques;2019-12-01
2. “Communis Hostis Omnium”: The Smerwick Massacre (1580) and the Law of Nations;Journal of British Studies;2019-07
3. Index;The Tudor Occupation of Boulogne;2019-02-07
4. Bibliography;The Tudor Occupation of Boulogne;2019-02-07
5. The Tudor Occupation of Boulogne and English Imperialism;The Tudor Occupation of Boulogne;2019-02-07