Abstract
In paragraph 48 of the Critique of Judgment, Immanuel Kant claimed that ‘only one kind of ugliness cannot be represented in accordance with nature without destroying all aesthetic satisfaction, hence artistic beauty, namely that which arouses disgust.’ However, from Baudelaire to Damien Hirst, there have been artists who delight in arousing disgust through their works, and many of these disgusting works, such as Baudelaire's Une Charogne, have high aesthetic merit. In her splendid new book, Savoring Disgust, Carolyn Korsmeyer rejects Kant's suggestion and argues that there is something called ‘aesthetic disgust,’ that is, ‘the arousal of disgust in an audience, a spectator, or a reader, under circumstances where that emotion both apprehends artistic properties and constitutes a component of appreciation.’
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference42 articles.
1. How Strange a Sadness?
2. The Pleasures of Tragedy;Feagin;American Philosophical Quarterly,1983
3. Purity and Danger
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Ugliness Is in the Gut of the Beholder;Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy;2022-12-28
2. Pourquoi il est bon de vivre certaines émotions dites négatives;Revue de métaphysique et de morale;2022-04-19
3. Philosophical aesthetics and cognitive science;WIREs Cognitive Science;2017-06-22
4. How Transparent is Disgust?;European Journal of Philosophy;2017-05-18