Abstract
AbstractRecently, a debate has developed between those who claim that essence can be explained in terms ofde remodality (modalists), and those who claim thatde remodality can be explained in terms of essence (essentialists). The aim of this paper is to suggest that we should reassess. It is assumed that either necessity is to be accounted for in terms of essence, or that essence is to be accounted for in terms of necessity. I will argue that we should assume neither. I discuss what role these key notions – essence and necessity – can reasonably be thought to contribute to our understanding of the world, and argue that, given these roles, there is no good reason to think that we should give an account of one in terms of the other. I conclude: if we can adequately explainde remodality and essence at all, we should aim to do so separately.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference31 articles.
1. Sameness and Substance Renewed
2. Essence and Modality;Fine;Philosophical Perspectives 8: Logic and Language,1994
3. Brutal Individuation;Hazlett;New Waves in Metaphysics,2010
4. What a Musical Work Is
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Against relationalism about modality;Philosophical Studies;2023-05-18
2. Ruth Barcan Marcus and Minimal Essentialism;Ratio;2023-04-28
3. L’approche non-modale de l’essence;Connaissance philosophique et connaissance des essences;2023
4. Connaissance philosophique, connaissance des essences : où en sommes-nous ?;Connaissance philosophique et connaissance des essences;2023
5. Essence;2022-11-11