Abstract
This article explores two contrasting accounts of the exposure of Cyrus the Elder: the lengthy version in Herodotus, replete with characteristics of the infancy of royal mythological heroes, and that in Isocrates’ Philippus, in which the ekthesis implies illegitimacy and inferiority, as part of Isocrates’ political agenda. Cyrus’ alleged exposure is an ideal case study for the ambivalence of infant exposure in classical Greek discourse, either to signify heroicity in an individual destined for greatness and the founding of a dynasty (as in Herodotus), or to allude to illegitimacy and so exclude the individual from civil society (as in Isocrates).
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Classics
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Smuggling infants;Citizenship in Antiquity;2023-06-02
2. Herodotus and the Question Why;Fordyce W Mitchel Me;2019-12-31
3. Ioanna Karamanou, Euripides, “Alexandros”, Texte und Kommentare Bd 57, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter, 2017, xvi+381 pp., 109,95 €, ISBN: 978- 3-11-053728-4;Exemplaria Classica;2019-12-13
4. Xenophon, Isocrates and the Achaemenid Empire: History, Pedagogy and the Persian Solution to Greek Problems;Trends in Classics;2018-09-06