Abstract
AbstractThis article aims to strengthen the link between history and theory by contributing to the scholarly conversation on “an integrated historical social science.” By examining the case of Qing China, it introduces a historically oriented and theoretically informed research agenda and toolkit for studying state making through the interactive lens of political sustainability and critical crisis. Using two historical upheavals as a prism, this article shows how destructive crises can have the unintended consequence of facilitating empire building and fostering political sustainability. Furthermore, it draws on theoretical insights from political science and sociology to construct a general framework for measuring the sustainability of political development and explaining the complex role of great crisis. This interdisciplinary model not only sheds new lights on the causative role of event, conjuncture, and structure but also enriches existing approaches to comparative historical analysis in general and state making in particular.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities
Reference55 articles.
1. Sng, Tuan-Hwee (2011). “Size and Agency Problems in Early Modern China and Japan.” Evanston, Illinois: Ph.D. Diss., Northwestern University.
2. Sustainability: The Issue of Our Age and a Concern for Local Government;Willis;Public Management,2006
3. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences
4. Review of Crises and Sequences in Political Development;Herr;The Journal of Modern History,1980
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献