Abstract
AbstractThis paper proposes the replication of Bird's (2010) and Serrano's (2011) studies, which examined distribution of practice effects in second language acquisition (SLA). These studies, which took place in authentic classroom contexts, produced conflicting results regarding the degree to which the learning of a second language (L2) benefited from distributed instruction. In the first part of the paper, I discuss the distribution of practice research in the learning and teaching of L2s. I then describe Bird's (2010) and Serrano's (2011) work, and highlight the strengths and limitations of the approaches of these studies. Finally, a number of approaches to approximate replications are suggested for each study in order to assess the reliability, internal validity, and generalizability of the original findings
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference52 articles.
1. Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention;Cepeda;Psychological Science,2008
2. An intensive look at intensity and language learning;Collins;TESOL Quarterly,2011
3. SLA research and L2 pedagogy: Misapplications and questions of relevance;Spada;Language Teaching,2015
4. Knowledge and Skill in ISLA
5. The desirable difficulty framework as a theoretical foundation for optimizing and researching second language practice;Suzuki;Modern Language Journal,2019
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献