Abstract
Abstract
This paper explores Chalmers and Glasziou's (2009) notion of ‘research waste’ from healthcare research to examine what it can offer the field of applied linguistics. Drawing on examples from both disciplines, we unpack Macleod et al.'s (2014) five research waste categories: (1) asking the wrong research questions, (2) failing to situate new research in the context of existing research, (3) inefficient research regulation/management, (4) failing to disseminate findings, and (5) poor research reporting practices. We advance this typology to help applied linguists identify and reduce avoidable research waste and improve the relevance, quality, and impact of their research.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference111 articles.
1. Furedi, F. (2013, September 9). Don't import the scourge of scientism into schools. Spiked Online. http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/dont_import_the_scourge_of_scientism_into_schools/14005
2. Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS);Downes;BMJ Open,2016
3. From research-as-practice to exploratory practice-as-research in language teaching and beyond;Hanks;Language Teaching,2019
4. Rigorous large-scale educational RCTs are often uninformative: Should we be concerned?;Lortie-Forgues;Educational Researcher,2019
5. Setting an agenda for English education research;Elliott;English in Education,2021
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献