Author:
Lightbown Patsy M.,Spada Nina
Abstract
AbstractOne of the challenges facing second and foreign language (L2) teachers and learners in primary and secondary school settings is the limited amount of time available. There is disagreement about how to meet this challenge. In this paper we argue against two ‘common sense’ recommendations for increasing instructional time – start as early as possible and use only the L2 (avoiding the use of the first language (L1)) in the classroom. We propose two better ways to increase the instructional time: provide periods of intensive instruction later in the curriculum and integrate the teaching of language and content. Studies in schools settings around the world have failed to find long-term advantages for an early start or exclusive use of the L2 in the classroom. Nevertheless, many language educators and policy makers continue to adopt these practices, basing their choice on their own intuitions and public opinion rather than on evidence from research.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference64 articles.
1. Loss of Family Languages: Should Educators Be Concerned?
2. US Foreign Service Institute. https://www.state.gov/m/fsi/sls/c78549.htm
3. Noyau, C. (Ed.) (2014). Transferts d'apprentissages et mise en regard des langues et des savoirs à l’école bilingue: le point de vue des élèves à travers les activités de classe. Actes des Journées scientifiques internationales de novembre 2013 (Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso) du projet AUF et OIF.
4. Is There a Role for the Use of the L1 in an L2 Setting?
5. The Time Factor and Compact Course Development
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献