A New Electorate? Explaining the Party Preferences of Immigrant-Origin Voters at the 2017 Bundestag Election

Author:

Goerres AchimORCID,Jasmin Mayer SabrinaORCID,Christopher Spies DennisORCID

Abstract

Abstract Immigrants now constitute a sizeable and rapidly growing group among many Western countries' electorates, but analyses of their party preferences remain limited. Theoretically, immigrants' party preferences might be explained with both standard electoral theories and immigrant-specific approaches. In this article, we rigorously test both perspectives against each other using the most recent data from Germany. Applying the Michigan model, with its three central explanatory variables – party identification, issue orientations and candidate evaluations – to the party preferences of immigrant-origin and native voters, we find that this standard model can explain both groups well. In contrast, we find no direct effects of the most prominent immigrant-specific variables, and neither do these meaningfully moderate the Michigan variables. However, we find strong formative effects on the presence of political attitudes and beliefs: immigrants with a longer time spent in Germany, a stronger German identity and less experience of discrimination report significantly fewer item non-responses for the Michigan model's main explanatory variables.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference71 articles.

1. When dual identity becomes a liability: identity and political radicalism among migrants;Simon;Psychological Science,2013

2. Candidate ethnicity and vote choice in Britain;Fisher;British Journal of Political Science,2014

3. Goerres, A , Mayer, SJ and Spies, DC (2021) Replication Data for: A New Electorate? Explaining the Party Preferences of Immigrant-Origin Voters at the 2017 Bundestag Election, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/MKRPE5. Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:0iI5YEApgB/F9e7vbswmUg== [fileUNF].

4. Taking ‘don't knows’ as valid responses: a multiple complete random imputation of missing data;Kroh;Quality and Quantity,2006

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3