Abstract
Abstract
Immigrants now constitute a sizeable and rapidly growing group among many Western countries' electorates, but analyses of their party preferences remain limited. Theoretically, immigrants' party preferences might be explained with both standard electoral theories and immigrant-specific approaches. In this article, we rigorously test both perspectives against each other using the most recent data from Germany. Applying the Michigan model, with its three central explanatory variables – party identification, issue orientations and candidate evaluations – to the party preferences of immigrant-origin and native voters, we find that this standard model can explain both groups well. In contrast, we find no direct effects of the most prominent immigrant-specific variables, and neither do these meaningfully moderate the Michigan variables. However, we find strong formative effects on the presence of political attitudes and beliefs: immigrants with a longer time spent in Germany, a stronger German identity and less experience of discrimination report significantly fewer item non-responses for the Michigan model's main explanatory variables.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference71 articles.
1. When dual identity becomes a liability: identity and political radicalism among migrants;Simon;Psychological Science,2013
2. Candidate ethnicity and vote choice in Britain;Fisher;British Journal of Political Science,2014
3. Goerres, A , Mayer, SJ and Spies, DC (2021) Replication Data for: A New Electorate? Explaining the Party Preferences of Immigrant-Origin Voters at the 2017 Bundestag Election, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/MKRPE5. Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:0iI5YEApgB/F9e7vbswmUg== [fileUNF].
4. Taking ‘don't knows’ as valid responses: a multiple complete random imputation of missing data;Kroh;Quality and Quantity,2006
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献