Abstract
The purpose of this article is to outline some of the more important ‘images’ of the environment held in the Soviet Union. By ‘images’ of the environment I refer to the manner in which people utilize the natural environment in order to meet their biological, social or aesthetic needs, and their perception of the means for fulfilling these needs. The environment may be perceived as infinitely renewable, and thus as a resource to be exploited with minimal attention to future consequences. Or the natural environment may be perceived as a scarce commodity, a unique gift in danger of being destroyed by humankind's productive activities. Furthermore, attitudes toward the environment may vary across cultures, or within the same culture depending on age, socio-economic status, political ideology, occupation or area of residence. The environmental image maintained by a group, culture or individual has implications far beyond any immediate impact on nature. Fundamental ideas about the structuring of society, the economy and the political system are involved. Positive attitudes towards environmental protection may clash with deeply held values – faith in science and technology, a commitment to quantitative economic growth and confidence in the existing hierarchical structure of social and political power. One's environmental image, therefore, may either support the established order, or may support fundamental change.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference65 articles.
1. Ziegler Charles E. , ‘Issue Creation and Interest Groups in Soviet Environmental Policy: The Applicability of the State Corporatist Model’, unpublished manuscript.
2. ‘Krugly stol Voprosy filosofii: Chelovek i sreda ego obitaniia’, Voprosy filosofii. No. 1 (1973). p. 53.
3. Renewed Polemics over Siberian Water Diversion Scheme;Voronitsyn;Radio Liberty Research,1982
4. Unichtozhenie Prirody (Frankfurt: Possev, 1978).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献