Abstract
Religions are organized in a variety of ways. They may resemble an elected autocracy, a parliamentary democracy or something akin to a monarchy, in which heredity plays a primary role. These differing power arrangements call for different types of strategic behavior in the fight for control of church doctrine and finances. They also induce different institutional responses. This article explains cases in which screening is highly institutionalized and when a person's age may be an important strategic factor in choosing a leader. It thus explains what otherwise would be very puzzling differences in the age of appointment across religions and within a particular religion, over time. The study also applies the methodology to politics more generally by looking at elections in Venice and Genoa in the eighteenth century and the appointment of leaders in present-day China.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference36 articles.
1. Dotson John. 2012. The China Rising Leader's Project, Part 1: The Chinese Communist Party and its Emerging Next Generation Leaders. U.S. – China Economic and Security Review Commission Staff Research Report.
2. Nonspatial Candidate Characteristics and Electoral Competition
3. Vox Populi, Vox Dei, Vox Sagittae;Maltzman;PS: Political Science and Politics,2006
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献