Cyber Terrorism and Public Support for Retaliation – A Multi-Country Survey Experiment

Author:

Shandler RyanORCID,Gross Michael L.ORCID,Backhaus SophiaORCID,Canetti DaphnaORCID

Abstract

AbstractDoes exposure to cyber terrorism prompt calls for retaliatory military strikes? By what psychological mechanism does it do so? Through a series of controlled, randomized experiments, this study exposed respondents (n = 2,028) to television news reports depicting cyber and conventional terror attacks against critical infrastructures in the United States, United Kingdom and Israel. The findings indicate that onlylethalcyber terrorism triggers strong support for retaliation. Findings also confirm that anger bridges exposure to cyber terrorism and retaliation, rather than psychological mechanisms such as threat perception or anxiety as other studies propose. These findings extend to the cyber realm a recent trend that views anger as a primary mechanism linking exposure to terrorism with militant preferences. With cyber terrorism a mounting international concern, this study demonstrates how exposure to this threat can generate strong public support for retaliatory policies, depending on the lethality of the attack.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference96 articles.

1. Revisiting the Estonian cyber attacks: digital threats and multinational responses;Herzog;Journal of Strategic Security,2011

2. Warring from the virtual to the real: assessing the public's threshold for war over cyber security;Kreps;Research and Politics,2017

3. ‘This is London’: cosmopolitan nationalism and the discourse of resilience in the case of the 7/7 terrorist attacks;Bean;Rhetoric and Public Affairs,2011

4. Bumiller, E and Shanker, T (2012) Panetta Warns of Dire Threat of Cyberattack on US New York Times, 11 October.

5. McDermott, R (2010) Decision making under uncertainty. Proceedings of a Workshop Deterring Cyberattacks: Informing Strategies and Developing Options for US Policy. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. pp. 227–241.

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3