Abstract
Abstract
In many countries, right-wing populist parties have gained electoral support by attracting voters from mainstream left parties. This has prompted public and scholarly debate about whether mainstream left parties can regain political power by taking a more restrictive position on immigration, a so-called accommodation strategy. However, selection bias confounds observational estimates of the effectiveness of this strategy. This letter reports the results of a survey experiment conducted among Danish voters during a unique political situation in which the mainstream left party's position on immigration is ambiguous, enabling experimental manipulation of voters' perceptions of the party's position. The authors show that, consistent with spatial models of politics, accommodation attracts anti-immigration voters and repels pro-immigration voters. Because repelled voters defect to other left parties, while attracted voters come from right parties, accommodation increases overall support for parties that support a mainstream left government. The results demonstrate that in some contexts, accommodation can improve the political prospects of the mainstream left.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference22 articles.
1. Voting Radical Right in Western Europe
2. Krause, W , Cohen, D and Abou-Chadi, T (2019) Does Accommodation Work? Mainstream Party Strategies and the Success of Radical Right Parties. Unpublished manuscript.
3. Milne, R (2019) Danish centre-left woos voters with tough immigration stance. Financial Times, June.
4. If you can't Beat them, Join them? Explaining Social Democratic Responses to the Challenge from the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe
5. A losing gamble. How mainstream parties facilitate anti-immigrant party success
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献