Abstract
AbstractDo the styles politicians use influence how voters evaluate them, and does this matter more for women than for men? Politicians regularly use anecdotal arguments, emotional appeals and aggressive attacks when communicating with voters. However, that women politicians have been branded as ‘nasty’, ‘inhuman’ and ‘unfeminine’ suggests that these strategies may come at a price for some. I report on a novel survey experiment assessing whether voters are biased in their perceptions and evaluations of politicians' communication styles. By manipulating politician gender and argument style, I assess, first, whether politicians incur backlash when violating gender-based stereotypes and, secondly, whether differential perceptions of the styles themselves explain this backlash. I find that style usage has important consequences for how voters evaluate politicians but that this is not gendered. These results have important implications, as they suggest that women politicians may not need to conform to stereotype-expected behaviours in order to receive positive voter evaluations.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference64 articles.
1. Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates
2. The Independent (2019) Farewell then Ms Maybot, you were almost human after all. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/theresa-may-resignation-brexit-europe-conservative-party-tories-a8928036.html.
3. The Transformation of British Welfare Policy
4. The Independent (2017b) Theresa May criticised for avoiding questions in ‘inhuman’ Newsnight interview. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/theresa-may-criticised-inhuman-newsnight-interview-grenfell-fire-response-meeting-victims-latest-a7794506.html.
5. The Good Politician
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献