Abstract
In the practice of social science, the most conspicuous recent attempt at theorizing about nonconformity and protest in late communism rests on the conceptual schema of ‘civil society versus the state’. Based on a case study of the institutional basis of criticism of, and dissent against, communism in China, I contend that the dichotomous concept ‘civil society versus the state’. when used to explain the transition from communism, is applicable only in rare, extreme cases and misleading in most cases. Instead, I introduce the concept of ‘institutional amphibiousness’, stressing institutional parasitism and institutional manipulation and conversion. In most cases, institutional amphibiousness more adequately accounts for the dynamics of the erosion of communism than the concept of ‘civil society versus the state’.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference107 articles.
1. Miller , ed., The Developments of Civil Society in Communist Systems, pp. 11–23, at p. 15.
2. Rigby T. H. , ‘The USSR: End of a Long, Dark Night?’
3. Protest in Beijing: Civil Society and Public Sphere in China;Strand;Problems of Communism,1990
4. Parallel Polis, or an Independent Society in Central and Eastern Europe;Benda;Social Research,1988
5. Between State and Society: The Construction of Corporateness in a Chinese Socialist Factory
Cited by
81 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献