Abstract
AbstractEmpirical studies show that many governments gear the provision of goods and services towards their ethnic peers. This article investigates governments’ strategies to provide ethnic favors in Africa. Recent studies of ethnic favoritism find that presidents' ethnic peers and home regions enjoy advantages, yet cannot disentangle whether goods are provided to entire regions or co-ethnic individuals. This article argues that local ethnic demography determines whether governments provide non-excludable public goods or more narrowly targeted handouts. Where government co-ethnics are in the majority, public goods benefit all locals regardless of their ethnic identity. Outside of these strongholds, incumbents pursue discriminatory strategies and only their co-ethnics gain from favoritism. Using fine-grained geographic data on ethnic demographics, the study finds support for the argument's implications in the local incidence of infant mortality. These findings have important implications for theories of distributive politics and conflict in multi-ethnic societies.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference70 articles.
1. Armesto, MA (2010) Territorial Control and Particularistic Spending: The Provision of Local Public Goods by Subnational Governments in Mexico and Argentina (PhD thesis) . Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame.
2. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed
3. FAO (2014) Global Administrative Unit Layers. Available at http://www.fao.org/geonetwork/srv/en/metadata.show?id=12691.
4. Ethnicity, Governance and the Provision of Public Goods
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献