Abstract
AbstractIs the quality of democracy undermined or enhanced by party-system fragmentation? Addressing this question would help us better assess normative claims about electoral reforms. Yet, doing so is difficult because of endogeneity issues: party systems are endogenous to many other dynamics in a polity. We overcome this problem by putting forward an instrument for the number of parties in a system, based on the level of fragmentation added by parties that narrowly make it to parliament. We then test the effect of party-system fragmentation on the quality of democracy, drawing upon an extensive battery of outcomes. Against previous literature, we find that a higher number of parties leads to more fractionalized governments, but has no impact on other democratic outcomes. Subsample analyses suggest that fragmentation may have some effect in contexts of very high polarization, but we find no effect in other theoretically meaningful subsamples. Our results indicate that party-system fragmentation may have fewer normative implications than previously assumed.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference104 articles.
1. More is better: The influence of collective female descriptive representation on external efficacy;Atkeson;Politics and Gender,2007
2. Explaining Women's Legislative Representation in Sub-Saharan Africa
3. Why coalitions? Party system fragmentation, small party bias, and preferential vote in Brazil
4. How is Government Stability Affected by the State of the Economy? Payoff Structures, Government Type and Economic State
5. Dinas, E , Foos, F , and Riera, P (2015a) How does the number of parties affect legislation? Paper presented at the EPSA conference 2015.