Abstract
AbstractHow to understand and deal with the principle of mutual trust, its emanations, interpretations, and imperatives has in recent years become one of the central and most critical issues in the development of the Area of Freedom Security and Justice (AFSJ). Civil justice may be the dark horse with respect to mutual trust among the policy areas of the AFSJ in the sense that it may show useful but hitherto hidden possibilities and have an un-tipped winning strategy. In particular, the balancing safeguards in legislation, the importance of which have been confirmed in case law, are important to ensure the fundamental right to a fair trial. However, that does not mean that mutual trust does not pose challenges in the context of civil justice. Hence, it remains important to focus on how—normatively, and by which regulatory means—to support mutual trust as well as how to balance, and perhaps limit, its implementation in order to enhance its legitimacy. In addition, the recent pressures towards harmonisation need to be carefully analysed.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference39 articles.
1. Faith and Scepticism in Private International Law: Trust, Governance, Politics, and Foreign Judgments;Whytock;Erasmus Law Review,2014
2. The Limits of Mutual Trust in Europe's Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: From Automatic Inter-State Cooperation to the Slow Emergence of the Individual
3. Time for a European “Full Faith and Credit Clause”;Frackowiak-Adamska;Common Market Law Review,2015
4. In the Court(s) We Trust – A Procedural Solution to the Mutual Trust Dilemma;Düsterhaus;Freedom Security and Justice: European Legal Studies,2017
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献