Abstract
AbstractThis study investigates whether the use of prosodic cues during instruction facilitates the processing of German accusative case markers. Two groups of third semester L1 English learners of L2 German completed Processing Instruction (PI) with aural input: Learners in the PI+P group heard sentences that included focused prosodic cues; learners in the PI group heard sentences with monotone prosody. The effects of training were assessed through an offline comprehension task, a written production task, and an online self-paced reading (SPR) task. The results for the offline tasks showed that the groups were similar with respect to their offline comprehension and production. The SPR task showed that both groups used case markers to interpret word order online to some extent; however, only the PI+P group did so in all conditions. These results suggest that prosody does play a role in (morpho)syntactic processing, and that covert activation of prosodic structures can facilitate processing during online reading tasks.
Funder
Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Education
Reference74 articles.
1. Explicit Instruction and Input Processing
2. Singmann, H. (2021). Mixed model reanalysis of RT data. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/afex/vignettes/afex_mixed_example.html
3. Contextual effects in processing L2 input sentences;VanPatten;Spanish Applied Linguistics,1998
4. Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing
5. Cue additivity and adaptivity in predictive processing
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献