Abstract
AbstractBy examining the cultural identity of China's Ming dynasty, this essay challenges two prevalent perceptions of the Ming in existing literature: to presume a monolithic socio-ethno-cultural Chinese empire and to equate the Ming Empire withChina(Zhongguo, the “middle kingdom”). It shows that the Ming constructedChinaas an ethnocultural space rather than a political entity. In essence,Chinawas defined as a Han domain that the Han people inhabited and where Han values were produced, practiced, and preserved in contrast to those of non-Han “barbarians,” be they domestic or foreign. The “Great Ming”—the dynastic title—cannot be confused withChina, the ethnocultural space. For the Ming ruling elite, the “Miao territory” in western Huguang and eastern Guizhou provinces represented a land “beyond the pale of civilization” (huawai), which was outside and different fromChina. The Ming construction of the ethnoculturalChinaconnects the imperial heritage to China's modern identity.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Heart-minds and harquebuses: the Bozhou rebellion in China (1587-1600);Small Wars & Insurgencies;2022-10-16
2. Genomic Insights Into the Demographic History of the Southern Chinese;Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution;2022-06-30
3. Ritual specialists
1;Religion, Ethnicity, and Gender in Western Hunan during the Modern Era;2021-07-15
4. Western Hunan;Religion, Ethnicity, and Gender in Western Hunan during the Modern Era;2021-07-15
5. Ethnic Distinctions, Legal Connotations: Chinese Patterns of Boundary Making and Crossing;SAGE Open;2021-07