Author:
Benton Lauren,Straumann Benjamin
Abstract
What role did the Roman legal concept ofres nullius(things without owners), or the related concept ofterra nullius(land without owners), play in the context of early modern European expansion? Scholars have provided widely different answers to this question. Some historians have argued that European claims based onterra nulliusbecame a routine part of early modern interimperial politics, particularly as a response by the English and French crowns to expansive Iberian claims supported by papal donations. Others have countered that allusions toterra nulliusmarked a temporary phase of imperial discourse and that claimants relied more often on other rationales for empire, rarely mentioningres nulliusorterra nulliusand often explicitly recognizing the ownership rights, and even the sovereignty, of local polities and indigenous peoples.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
111 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. ‘
Contra ius gentium
’: The Mendoza-Drake Dispute and English Legal Arguments for Empire, 1580–1585;Global Intellectual History;2024-08-03
2. Conclusions and Implications;Indigenous Rights and the Legacies of the Bible;2024-06-27
3. Polities in Place;Indigenous Rights and the Legacies of the Bible;2024-06-27
4. Humans and Other Creatures;Indigenous Rights and the Legacies of the Bible;2024-06-27
5. Canaanites in the Land;Indigenous Rights and the Legacies of the Bible;2024-06-27