Abstract
AbstractWe employ the concept of stupidity to address why more has not been done to address climate change and sustainable development. While the ‘new’ science of stupid has long existed in organizational studies, academicians have been too polite to call it that and organizational researchers historically labeled it the ‘threat-rigidity effect.’ With Alvesson and Spicer’s ‘stupidity-based theory of organizations’ management researchers overcame this reluctance. In this work we explore what we will call the ‘stress-stupidity system.’ Building on the threat-rigidity effect, we outline the elements of the stress-stupidity system and look at how we may be able to ‘fix stupid’ to address issues of sustainability.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business and International Management
Reference112 articles.
1. The shadow of the future: Discount rates, later generations and the environment;Farber;Vanderbilt Law Review,1993
2. Recent changes to the IMF, WTO and SPD: emerging global mode of regulation or social structure of accumulation for long wave upswing?
3. Heuristics and Biases
4. A Stupidity-Based Theory of Organizations
5. Pomeroy, R. (2015). What is stupid? We now have a scientific answer. Real Clear Science. Retrieved from https://www.realclearscience.com/blog/2015/11/we_now_have_a_scientific_definition_of_stupidity.html.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献