Abstract
Many human rights charters contain prohibitions on inhuman and degrading treatment of
prisoners and detainees. Terms like “inhuman” and
“degrading” are difficult to interpret, but they are certainly not
meaningless. It is important to attend to attend to the meanings of the words
themselves, as well as to the decisions that courts have made about particular
practices. Reflection on the meanings of these highly-charged terms reveals important
complexity, which we can unpack in a way that enables us to better focus our debate
about the proper treatment of prisoners and detainees. Focusing on the
ordinary-language meaning of evaluative terms like “inhuman” and
“degrading” also helps us approach the relation between rules and
standards in law more thoughtfully, as we see why it is important not to let the
evaluative meaning of these terms be superseded by the definitions established in the
course of their application.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference47 articles.
1. Tyrer v. United Kingdom, judgment of 25 April 1978 Series A No 26.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献