Abstract
In the most general terms, this article focuses on the tension between competing justifications of intellectual property. Section I examines the nature and definition of economic pragmatism and argues that, while economic pragmatism comes in many flavors, each is either unstable or self-defeating. Section II advances the view that Anglo-American systems of intellectual property have both theoretical and pragmatic features. In Section III a sketch of a theory is offered--a theory that may limit applications of economic pragmatism and provide the foundation for copyright, patent, and trade secret institutions. To be justified--to warrant coercion on a worldwide scale--systems of intellectual property should be grounded in theory. Intellectual property rights are, in essence, no different than our rights to life, liberty, and tangible property. Intellectual property rights are neither pure social constructions nor bargains without foundations.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference76 articles.
1. Evaluation of the American Patent System;Oppenheim;J. Pat. Off. Soc’y; Palmer, supra note 35 and “Are Patents and Copyrights Morally Justified? The Philosophy of Property Rights and Ideal Objects” (1990) 13 Harv. J. L. and Pub. Pol’y,1951
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Intellectual property rights;i-manager's Journal on Economics & Commerce;2024
2. Protecting Designs Legally;Design Evolution and The Law;2022
3. Sensorium®: The Splash of Sensory Trademarks;Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société;2019-06-25
4. Innovation Cartography and Patentomics: Past, Present and Future;Global Governance of Intellectual Property in the 21st Century;2016
5. Defining Traditional Knowledge: A Perspective from the Caribbean;Caribbean Quarterly;2012-12