Abstract
The difficulty with the study of Libyan history, certainly before the sixteenth century, is twofold: firstly the definition of Libya as a subject, secondly the lack of information. The definition of the subject starts from the modern political boundaries, which do not predate the Ottomans; the lack of information must be related to the fact that most of the territory is desert, and peripheral to the concerns of wealthier and more powerful neighbours — Egypt, Tunis, Kanem/Borno, and the maritime empires of western Europe. Instead of a positive entity of which the modern political limits are only the most recent expression, it is all too easy to see a hollow space between neighbours north, south, east and west. How to fill that space conceptually and evidentially is the problem explicit or implicit in all the literature over the years since the foundation of the Society for Libyan Studies. This essay does not aim to be exhaustive, simply to indicate the lines of thought and investigation, and offer some conclusions.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference55 articles.
1. Shaykh Aḥmad Zarrūq: his life and influence in the light of Kitāb al-tadhkīr of Ibn Ghalbūn;Furat;Mujallat al-Buḥūth al-Ta'rīkhiyya,1982
2. Excavations at Ajdabiyah: Second Interim Report
3. The Petrological Investigation of Roman and Islamic Ceramics from Cyrenaica
4. The Banu Hilal and their role in the holy war in Ifriqiya and Andalus to the end of the sixth century A.H./twelfth century A.D.;Ṭayyibī;Majallat al-Buḥūth al-Ta'rīkhiyya,1985
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献