Abstract
Abstract
In a recent paper, Christian List (2014) has argued for the compatibilism of free will and determinism. Drawing on a distinction between physical possibility (used in defining determinism) and agential possibility (used in defining free will), List constructs a formal two-level model in which the two concepts are consistent. This paper's first contribution is to show that though List's model is formally consistent, philosophically it falls short of establishing a satisfactory compatibilist position. Ensuingly, an analysis of the shortcomings of the model leads to the identification of a controversial epistemological assumption implicit in the statements of both compatibilist and incompatibilist positions. Arguing that this assumption is not currently satisfied, the paper's second contribution is to show that neither the compatibilist nor the incompatibilist position is presently well-founded.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science
Reference24 articles.
1. The Solution to the Problem of the Freedom of the Will;Dupré;Philosophical Perspectives,1996
2. XII—What’s Wrong with the Consequence Argument: A Compatibilist Libertarian Response
3. Emergent Chance
4. Rendsvig, R.K. and Symons, J. (2019). ‘Epistemic Logic.’ In E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/logic-epistemic/.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献