Abstract
In their recent survey of the synoptic problem E. P. Sanders and M. Davies argue that a complicated solution must be held to be the most likely, and conclude,Mark probably did sometimes conflate material which came separately to Matthew and Luke (so the Griesbach hypothesis), and Matthew probably did conflate material which came separately to Mark and Luke (the twosource hypothesis). Thus we think that Luke knew Matthew (so Goulder, the Griesbachians and others) and that both Luke and Matthew were the original authors of some of their sayings material (so especially Goulder). Following Boismard, we think it likely that one or more of the gospels existed in more than one edition, and that the gospels as we have them may have been dependent on more than one proto- or intermediate gospel.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Religious studies,History
Reference30 articles.
1. Plutarch's method of work in the Roman Lives
2. Conflated Texts
3. Compositional Conventions and the Synoptic Problem;Downing;JBL,1988
4. Goulder , Luke, 347.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Q, Memory and Matthew: A Response to Alan Kirk;Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus;2017-12-11
2. Plausibility, Probability, and Synoptic Hypotheses;EPHEMER THEOL LOVAN;2017
3. The Synoptic Problem: Where to from here?;PACIFICA;2017
4. Bibliography;The Synoptic Problem and Statistics;2014-10-14
5. Waxing Careless: Poirier, Derrenbacker and Downing;Journal for the Study of the New Testament;2013-05-14