Abstract
In a recent article Helmut Koester argues against the current practice of distinguishing between canonical Gospels, on the one hand, and apocryphal gospels, on the other, and treating the apocryphal gospels as ‘step children’ of New Testament research. Koester maintains that there are a number of the ‘apocryphal’ gospels which ‘belong to a very early stage in the development of gospel literature — a stage that is comparable to the sources which were used by the gospels of the New Testament.’ One of those texts to which he points is the Nag Hammadi tractate theApocryphon of James. This paper is an attempt to legitimize one ‘step child’ of New Testament scholarship as a valid source for investigating the earliest levels of the Jesus traditions.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Religious studies,History
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Words of Jesus in the Gospel of Thomas;GNOSTICA;2021-05-17
2. Index;Eschatology and the Saviour;2019-09-05
3. Bibliography;Eschatology and the Saviour;2019-09-05
4. TheGospel of Mary: Synopses of the Greek and Coptic MSS;Eschatology and the Saviour;2019-09-05
5. TheGospel of Mary: Text and Translations;Eschatology and the Saviour;2019-09-05