Abstract
Abstract
While startups are acknowledged for their potential to address sustainability issues, little is known on how to assess their impact, given the uncertainty they deal with and their lack of resources. This paper investigates the ones that are supposed to be ‘best-in-class’ in that matter, that is, startups targeting sustainability, in order to explore how they integrate sustainability impact assessment in their entrepreneurial process. We conducted a multiple case study of eight sustainable startups, based on a 2-year longitudinal research in their incubator to gather multiple sources of information. Our results revealed that the integration of the triple bottom line in the entrepreneurial process has a major effect on startups’ sustainability impact assessment practices. ‘Born-sustainable startups’, which have aimed for the triple bottom line since idea generation, have more robust tools and routines than ‘Transitioned sustainable startups’, which integrated the triple bottom line during prototype/validation.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business and International Management
Reference87 articles.
1. European Commission. (2013). Entrepreneurship 2020 action plan. Reigniting the entrepreneurial spirit in Europe . Retrieved June 10, 2023 , from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0795:FIN:en:PDF.
2. Fintech and SMEs sustainable business models: Reflections and considerations for a circular economy
3. Environmental Management in SMEs in the UK: Practices, Pressures and Perceived Benefits
4. Dee, N. , Gill, D. , Weinberg, C. , & McTavish, S. (2015). Startup support programmes, What’s the difference? Nesta. Retrieved June 10, 2023 , from https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/startup-support-programmes-whats-the-difference/.