Abstract
Ovid's Tristia4.10 has in the past chiefly been considered as a source of biographical information rather than as a poem, but increasing interest in the poetry of Ovid's exile has now at last started to promote serious efforts to appreciate its literary qualities. The poem presents a formidable challenge to the critic: at first reading it seems a singularly pedestrian account of the poet's life and, although one may adduce plenty of parallels for details in its phrasing elsewhere in the poetry of Ovid and the other Augustans, it is clear that Ovid's thought-processes are not to be explained solely in terms of the main stream of Greco-Roman poetic tradition. Prose biography and autobiography, rhetorical apology and eulogy, subliterary epitaphs and inscriptional lists of achievements: all these types of writing could have influenced Ovid's selection of data.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Philosophy,History,Classics
Reference36 articles.
1. Brunt J. M. (Oxford,1967).
2. Suerbaum W. , ANRW Il.31.1(1980)206f.
3. Austin R.G. ,‘IIIe ego qui quondam…’ CQ18 (1968)
Cited by
75 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Entre dépression et ennui. Les étranges mélancolies de Clemens Ianicius (1516–1543);Studia Litteraria;2022-08-02
2. The Problem of Lygdamus and Ovid Reconsidered;Hermes;2020
3. Index Locorum;Afterlives of the Roman Poets;2019-12-31
4. Bibliography;Afterlives of the Roman Poets;2019-12-31
5. Post-Mortem;Afterlives of the Roman Poets;2019-12-31